首页> 外文OA文献 >Cosmopolitan (Dis)encounters: The Local and the Global in Anthony Minghella’s Breaking and Entering and Rachid Bouchareb’s London River
【2h】

Cosmopolitan (Dis)encounters: The Local and the Global in Anthony Minghella’s Breaking and Entering and Rachid Bouchareb’s London River

机译:大都会(Dis)遭遇:安东尼·明格拉的突破和进入中的本地和全球以及Rachid Bouchareb的伦敦河

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Through the postcolonial reading of Breaking and Entering (Anthony Minghella, 2006) and London River (Rachid Bouchareb, 2009), I mean to analyse the multiethnic urban geography of London as the site where the legacies of Empire are confronted on its home ground. In the tradition of filmmakers like Stephen Frears, Ken Loach, Michael Winterbottom or Mike Leigh, who have faithfully documented the city’s transformation from an imperial capital to a global cosmopolis, Minghella and Bouchareb demonstrate how the dream of a white, pure, uncontaminated city is presently «out of focus», while simultaneously confirming that colonialism persists under different forms. In both films the city’s imperial icons are visually deconstructed and resignified by those on whom the metropolitan meanings were traditionally imposed and now reclaim their legitimate space in the new hybrid and polyglot London. Nevertheless, despite the overwhelming presence of the multicultural rhetoric in contemporary visual culture, their focus is not on the carnival of transcultural consumption where questions of class, power and authority conveniently seem to disappear, but on the troubled lives of its agents, who experience the materially local urban reality as inevitably conditioned by the global forces –international war on terror, media coverage, black market, immigration mafias, corporate business– that transcend the local. This paradox is also perceived in the way the two filmmakers depict the postcolonial metropolis as the locus of social inequality and disequilibrium, but also as the scenario of unexpected encounters and alliances where both the protagonists and the spectators can explore the fantasies and fears about Otherness, and thus contest racial stereotypes.
机译:通过对《闯入与闯入》(安东尼·明格拉,2006年)和伦敦河(Rachid Bouchareb,2009年)的后殖民读本,我的意思是分析伦敦的多种族城市地理环境,作为帝国遗产在其本国面临的地方。按照斯蒂芬·弗雷尔斯(Stephen Frears),肯·洛奇(Ken Loach),迈克尔·温特伯顿(Michael Winterbottom)或迈克·利(Mike Leigh)等电影摄制师的传统,忠实地记录了这座城市从帝国首都到全球大都市的转变,明格拉(Minghella)和布加勒布(Bouchareb)展现了一个白色,纯净,未被污染的城市的梦想是如何实现的目前“失去重点”,同时确认殖民主义以不同形式持续存在。在这两部电影中,传统上都具有大都会意义的人们在视觉上对这座城市的皇室形象进行了解构和重新命名,现在他们在新的混合和多语种伦敦中恢复了其合法的空间。然而,尽管当代视觉文化中大量出现了多元文化的修辞学,但他们的关注点并不在于跨文化消费的狂欢,在这种狂欢中,阶级,权力和权威的问题似乎不复存在了,而是针对经历过这一过程的代理商的困境生活。实质上是当地城市的现实,这不可避免地受到超越当地的全球力量-国际反恐战争,媒体报道,黑市,移民黑手党,公司业务的制约。两位电影摄制者将后殖民大都市描述为社会不平等和不平衡的源泉,也将这种矛盾理解为一种矛盾,这是意外遭遇和结盟的场景,主角和旁观者都可以探索幻想和对异性的恐惧,从而挑战种族定型观念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号